International Journal of E-Business Development          
International Journal of E-Business Development(IJED)
ISSN:2225-7411(Print)      ISSN:2226-7336(Online)
Editor-in-chief: Prof. Steven Li, RMIT University, Australia
How Strategic Orientation Affects Inter-Organizational Networks in Uncertain Environment
Full Paper(PDF, 527KB)
This article deals with business network and cluster dynamics, as well as inter-firm joint-ventures and collaborations, in order to study their evolution and possible effects when radical innovation occurs inside them. Each network transformation is brought about by specific combination of changes in tie creation, tie deletion and power inside the network. In the present work an agent based model is introduced (E³), which aims to explore how innovation diffusion can facilitate network formation of existing enterprises, affect network topology (e.g. an enterprise owning an innovative process could become a focal point), induce new players to enter the market and spread onto the network by being shared or internally acquired by new players. In order to study these dynamics, with regards to the optimal balancing among different strategies and the importance of exogenous parameters in cluster creation, a model is presented. It follows the agent based paradigm, particularly suited for describing complex social systems in which many parts interact among them. This allows creating simulations of the analyzed system and testing different hypothesis. Besides, it’s a paradigm in which the emergent features of complex systems can arise spontaneously, thanks to the bottom-up design. A model is introduced and described in detail. Qualitative results supported by an empirical case study are described, reflecting current state-of-the art theories. The results show how clusters emerge and evolve among enterprises, and how radical innovation can trigger this phenomenon.
Keywords:Network Dynamic; Radical Innovation; Innovation Diffusion; Agent Based Model
Author: Paola Pisano1, Marco Pironti1, Alison Rieple2
1.E-Business L@b, University of Torino, Italy
2.Westminster University, UK
  1. K. Barclay, J. Savage, Object-Oriented Design with UML and Java, Elsevier, 2004.
  2. S. R. Barley, “Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, pp. 404-441, 1996.
  3. J. A. C. Baum, T. Calabrese, B. S. Silverman, “Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 267-294, 2000.
  4. J. A. C. Baum, X. Stan Li, J. M. Usher, “Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains Acquisitions”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 4, 2000.
  5. M. J. Benner, M. L. Tushman, “Exploitation, Exploration, And Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 238-256, 2003.
  6. J. Birkinshaw, J. Bessant, R. Delbridge, “Finding, Forming, and Performing: Creating Networks for Discontinuous Innovation”, California Management Review, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 67-83, 2007.
  7. S. M. Brondoni, “Market-Driven Management, Competitive Customer Value And Global Network”, Shymphonia Emerging Issues in Management, n. 1, 2009.
  8. S. L. Brown, K. M. Eisenhardt, “The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1-34, 1997.
  9. R.A. Burgelman “Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: theory and filed research”, Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 239–263, 1991.
  10. R.A. Burgelman, “Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 325–358, 2002.
  11. M. E. Burkhardt, D. J. Brass, “Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change - the Effects of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 104-127, 1990.
  12. H. W. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
  13. R. Christensen, “Where is HR?”, Human Resource Management, vol. 36, pp. 81–84, 1997.
  14. N. Cowan, Z. Chen, J. N. Rouder, “Constant capacity in an immediate serial-recall task: a logical sequel to Miller (1956)”, Psychol. Sci., vol. 15, pp. 634–640, 2004.
  15. R. L. Daft, K. E. Weick, “Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 284-295, 1984.
  16. J. Davis, K. Eisenhardt, C. Bingham, “Complexity theory, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules”, Working paper, Stanford Technology Ventures Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2007.
  17. G. G. Dess, D. W. Beard, “Dimension of organizational Task environments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 52-73, 1984.
  18. C. M. Fiol, E. J. O'Connor, “Waking up! Mindfulness in the Face of Bandwagons” The Academy of Management Review , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 54-70, 2003.
  19. S. P. Franklin, A. C. Graesser, “Is it an agent, or just a program?: A taxonomy for autonomous agents”, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Intelligent Agents III, pp. 21-35, 1997.
  20. C. Freeman, L. Soete, The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd Edition, MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 3, volume 1, number 0262061953, 1997.
  21. J. Galaskiewicz, Exchange Networks and Community Politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1979.
  22. J. R. Galbraith, Organization Design, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
  23. A. Glasmeier, The high-tech potential. Economic development in rural America. New Brunswick, NJ, Center for Urban Policy Research, 1991.
  24. G. M. Golinelli, M. Gatti, “L'impresa sistema vitale. Il governo dei rapporti inter-sistemici”, SYMPHONYA Emerging Issue in Management, no. 2, 2001.
  25. M. S. Granovetter, The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis, pp. 105–130. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982.
  26. M. S. Granovetter, “Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 91, pp. 481-93, 1985.
  27. R. Gulati, “Alliances and Network”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, pp. 293-317, 1998.
  28. R. Gulati, “Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 397-420, 1999.
  29. R. Gulati, N. Nohria A. Zaheer, “Strategic networks”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 203-15, 2000.
  30. D. C. Hambrick, P. A. Mason, “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers”, The Academy of Management Review , vol. 9, no. 2, 1984.
  31. J. R. Harrison, Z. Lin, G. R. Carroll, K. M. Carley, “Simulation Modeling in Organizational and Management Research”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1229-1234, 2007.
  32. R. M. Henderson, K. B. Clark, “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, Special Issue: Technology, Organizations, and Innovation, pp. 9-30, 1990.
  33. D. J. Hickson, C. R. Hinning, C. A. Lee, R. E. Schnech, J. M. Pennings, “A strategic contingency theory of intraorganizational power”, Administrative Science Quartely, vol. 16, 1971.
  34. J. H. Holland, J. H. Miller, “Artificial Adaptive Agent in Economic Theory”, American Economic Review, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 365-370, 1991.
  35. N. R:.Jennings, “Software agents”, IEEE Review, pp. 17-20, 1996.
  36. D. Kahneman, Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
  37. R. Katz, M. Tushman, “Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: an empirical evaluation and integration in an R&D setting”, Management Science, vol. 23, pp. 139–162, 1979.
  38. B. Kogut, “Ventures and the option to expand and acquire”, Management Science, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 19-33, 1991.
  39. B. Koka, R. Madhavan, J. E. Prescott, “The evolution of interfirm networks: Environmental effects on patterns of network change”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, pp. 721–737, 2006.
  40. B. R. Koka, J. E. Prescott, "Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance.", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 639-6D, 2008.
  41. M. P. Koza, A. Y. Lewin The co-evolution of strategic alliances Organization Science, n. 3, pp. 255–264, 1998
  42. D. Krackhardt, “Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, pp. 342-369, 1990.
  43. D. Krackhardt, “The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations”. In N. Nohria & R. C. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, pp. 216–239. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
  44. D. A. Levinthal, “The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change”, Ind Corp Change, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 217–247, 1998.
  45. D. A. Levinthal, J. G. March, “The Myopia of Learning”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, pp. 95-112, 1993.
  46. R. Madhavan, B. R. Koka, et al., “Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 439-459, 1998.
  47. J. G. March, “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, vol. 2, pp. 71-87, 1991.
  48. R. E. Miles, C. C. Snow, Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1978.
  49. F. J. Milliken, “Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, Effect and Response Uncertainty”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 12 , no. 1, pp. 133-143, 1987.
  50. R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, 1982.
  51. W. Ocasio, “Towards an attention-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, pp. 187–206, 1997.
  52. K. Pavitt, “Innovation process”, in J. Agerberg, D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, 2005.
  53. J. Pfeffer, Power in Organizations. HarperCollins, 1981.
  54. J. Pfeffer, G. R. Salancik, The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, Harper & Row, 1978.
  55. W. W. Powell, “Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization”. pp. 295–336 in B. M. Staw, L. L. Cummings (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI, 1990.
  56. W. W. Powell, K. Koput, L. Smith-Doerr, “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, pp. 116-145, 1996.
  57. W. W. Powell, K. W. Koput, L. Smith-Doerr, J. Owen-Smith, “Network Position and Firm Performance: Organizational Returns to Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry”, Research in The Sociology of Organizations, vol. 16, pp. 129-159, 1999.
  58. R. Radner, M. Rothschild, “On the allocation of effort”, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 358-376, June, 1975.
  59. N. Rosenberg, Technology and American Economic Growth. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
  60. N. Rosenberg, Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  61. S. Roth, “The meaning of bridging organizations for the political participation of women”, Femina Politica, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 30-37, 2002.
  62. J. A Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London, Unwin, 1942/87.
  63. H. A. Simon, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations, 4th ed. in 1997, The Free Press, 1947.
  64. H. A. Simon, “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 1 pp. 99-118, 1955.
  65. P. H. Soh, “Network patterns and competitive advantage before the emergence of a dominant design”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 438-461, 2010.
  66. L. Tesfatsion, K. L. Judd, “Agent-Based Computational Economics” in Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2: 2006.
  67. J. Tidd, J. Bessant, K. L. R. Pavitt, Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change, (2nd ed.), Chichester, Wiley, 2000.
  68. M. Tripsas, G. Gavetti, “Capabilities, Cognition and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 1147-1161, 2000.
  69. M. L. Tushman, P. Anderson, “Technological discontinuties and organizational environments”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 31, pp. 439-65, 1986.
  70. M. Tushman, E. Romanelli, “Uncertainty, Social Location and Influence in Decision Making: A Sociometric Analysis”, Management Science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 12-23, 1983.
  71. J. Uotila, M. Maula, T. Keil, S. A. Zahra, “Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 30, pp. 221-231, 2009.
  72. B. Uzzi, “Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 42, pp. 35-67, 1997.
  73. A. H. Van de Ven, A. L. Delbecq, R. Jr. Koenig, “Determinants of Coordination Modes Within Organizations”, American Sociological Review, vol. 41, no. 3, April, 1976.
  74. E. Von Hippel, The Sources of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
  75. M. Woolridge, N. Jennings, “Intelligent agents: Theory and practice”, Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115-152, 1995.
  76. A. Zucchella, “Network Social Responsibility”, Shymphonia Emerging Issues in Management, no. 2, 2007.