Journal of Civil Engineering and Science                 
Journal of Civil Engineering and Science(JCES)
ISSN:2227-4634 (Print)
Chronographic Allocation Techniques for Construction Projects
Full Paper(PDF, 192KB)
The literature is abundant in terms of research on resource management and optimization methods. Many deterministic, probabilistic and heuristic methods propose how to use resources efficiently. However, this paper discusses allocation techniques, i.e. how to technically allocate resources to activities rather than how to use resources efficiently. Though this subject is thoroughly covered by commercial scheduling software, it is generally absent from the literature. This paper compares the proposed Chronographic Modeling with the methods employed by commercial scheduling software. The new allocation methodology defines three attribute methods: complete attribute, attribute by segment and attribute by scale. Proposing internal divisions, as well as internal, external, vertical and horizontal scales, allows planners to create all kinds of attributes, from bulk allocation to any type of external and internal scale attribute. The links between scales could also show interactions between different measurement units and offer several types of durations, quantities and costs for increased flexibility and resolution of the limitations of existing methods. This paper adds to the body of knowledge by introducing a complete and realistic allocation methodology for construction project scheduling.
Keywords:Chronographic; Precedence, Modeling; Attribute; Resource Scheduling; Resource Assignment; Scheduling Software; Microsoft Project; Primavera; Tilos; Construction Management; Project Planning
Author: Adel Francis1
1.Department of Construction Engineering, école de technologie supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
  1. B. Ashuri and M. Tavakolan, “Fuzzy enabled hybrid genetic algorithm-particle swarm optimization approach to solve TCRO problems in construction project planning,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 138(9), pp. 1065-1074, 2012. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000513.
  2. J. D. Caprace, C. Petcu, M. G. Velarde, and P. Rigo, “Optimization of shipyard space allocation and scheduling using a heuristic algorithm,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology (Japan), vol. 18(3), pp. 404-417, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s00773-013-0217-2.
  3. L.-S. Kang, H.-S. Moon, C.-H. Min, S.-K. Kim, and H. S. Kim, “Developing an active resource allocation algorithm considering resource supply and demand in a construction site,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 19(1), pp. 17-27, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s12205-013-0203-6.
  4. S. Asgari, A. Afshar, and K. Madani, “Cooperative game theoretic framework for joint resource management in construction,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 140(3), 2014. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000818.
  5. Y. Zhou, L. Ding, X. Wang, M. Truijens, and H. Luo, “Applicability of 4D modeling for resource allocation in mega liquefied natural gas plant construction,” Automation in Construction, vol. 50(C), pp. 50-63, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.016.
  6. B. Ashuri and M. Tavakolan, “Shuffled frog-leaping model for solving time-cost-resource optimization problems in construction project planning,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 29(1), 2015. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000315.
  7. S.-M. Chen, F. H. Griffis, P.-H. Chen, and L.-M. Chang, “Simulation and analytical techniques for construction resource planning and scheduling,” Automation in Construction, vol. 21(1), pp. 99-113, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.018.
  8. S. Min and H. H. Einstein, “Resource scheduling and planning for tunneling with a new resource model of the Decision Aids for Tunneling (DAT),” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 51, pp. 212-225, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.038.
  9. M.-F. F. Siu, M. Lu, and S. Abourizk, “Resource supply-demand matching scheduling approach for construction workface planning,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 142(1), 2016. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001027.
  10. L. Zhang, X. Zou, and Z. Kan, “Improved strategy for resource allocation in repetitive projects considering the learning effect,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 140(11), 2014. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000896.
  11. A. Francis and E. T. Miresco, “Decision support for project management using a chronographique approach,” Journal of Decision Systems, Special issue JDS-DM in UCE: Decision Making in Urban and Civil Engineering, vol. 11(3-4), pp. 383-404, 2002.
  12. A. Francis and E. T. Miresco, “A chronographic method for construction project planning,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering (CSCE), vol. 33(12), pp. 1547-1557, 2006. doi: 10.1139/l06-148.
  13. A. Francis and E. T. Miresco, “Simulation of execution alternatives using chronographic scheduling logic,” Journal of Civil Engineering and Science (JCES), vol. 5(1), pp. 1-8, 2016. doi: 10.5963/JCES0501001.
  14. A. Francis, “Comparing time and quality scales for relatinship and float calculations,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 164, pp. 49-56, 2016.
  15. A. Francis, “Simulating uncertainties in construction projects with chronographical scheduling logic,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 143(1), pp. 1-14, 2017. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001212.