Journal of Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering (JWRHE)
An Open Access Journal
ISSN:2306-7705(Print)      ISSN:2306-7691(Online)
Prof. Bill Hu, Florida State University, USA
Frequency: Quarterly
Enhanced Representation of Java Sea Tidal Propagation through Sensitivity Analysis
Full Paper(PDF, 2216KB)
Java Sea is a very complex tidal region due to its associated intrinsic geometrical characteristics which include coastline geometry, small islands and sharply varying bottom topography. Several numerical modelling studies have been conducted to evaluate the tidal characteristics of Java Sea. The present modelling study is an attempt to enhance the representation of tidal propagation of Java Sea by performing sensitivity analysis using Delft3D. Several simulations were done with Manning (0.015, 0.018 0.02, 0.03, 0.032 and 0.035) and Chezy (50, 55, 60, 65 and 70) bottom roughness coefficients in order to enhance the model performance. In general Java Sea is shallow in nature however based on sensitivity analysis with different bottom roughness coefficients, bottom roughness coefficients map was created and applied in combination with varying spatial wind to understand its effect on tidal propagation. The model performance has been verified by comparing with observed amplitudes and phases of M2, S2, K1, O1 tidal constituents at several locations on southern and northern coast of Java Sea. The root mean square error (RMSE) between observed and modelled amplitudes were 0.05, 0.04, 0.06, 0.04 calculated for M2, S2, K1 and O1 tidal constituents respectively at northern coast. Similarly, the maximum RMS error between observed and modelled phase of 34.07 was calculated for S2 tidal constituent. Most importantly, model results clearly indicated bottom roughness coefficients of 0.02, 0.03, 0.032 and 0.035 largely influencing the semi-diurnal tidal harmonic constituents compared to diurnal tidal constituents. However, the spatial varying wind had minimal effect on amplitude and phase. The present study clearly indicates that the assessment of tidal propagation in such a shallow water environment could be enhanced through detailed sensitivity analysis.
Keywords:Java Sea; Numerical Model; Sensitivity Analysis; Tidal Propagation; Bottom Roughness; Spatial Wind
Author: Sibtey Hasan1, Chiranjeevi Rambabu A2
1.Dewberry Engineers Inc., New York US
2.Worley Parsons Sea India Pvt Ltd., India
  1. Alan, F. Koropitan and Motoyoshi Ikeda., “Three-dimensional modeling of tidal circulation and mixing over the Java Sea,” J. Ocean, vol. 64, pp. 61-80, 2008.
  2. D. Pauly, P. Martosubroto and J. Saeger, “The mutiara 4 surveys in the Java and Southern South China Sea”, November 1974 to July 1976. pp. 47-54. In: D. Pauly and P. Martosubroto (eds.) Baseline Studies in Biodiversity: The fish Resources of Western Indonesia. ICLARM Studies and Reviews 23, 1996.
  3. K. Wyrtki, Physical Oceanography of the Southeast Asian Waters. NAGA Rep. 2, Scripps Inst. of Oceanogr. Univ. of Calif., La Jolla, California, p. 195, 1961.
  4. P. Mazzega, and M. Bergé, “Ocean tides in the Asian semienclosed seas from TOPEX/POSEIDON,” J. Geoph. Res., 99(24), pp. 867-24,881, 1994.
  5. T. Hatayama, T. Awaji, and K. Akitomo, “Tidal currents in the Indonesian Seas and their effect on transport and mixing,” J. Geophys. Res., 101(12), pp. 353, 12-373, 1996.
  6. J. H. Simpson, C. M. Allen, and N. C. G. Morris, “Fronts on the continental shelf,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 83, pp. 4607-4614, 1978.
  7. R. D. Ray, G. D. Egbert, and S. Y. Erofeeva, “A brief overview of tides in the Indonesian Seas,” Oceanography, 18(4), pp. 74-79, 2005.
  8. G. D. Egbert and S. Y. Erofeeva., “Efficient inverse modeling of Barotropic Ocean tides,” J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., vol. 19, pp. 183-204, 2002.
  9. M. Yusuf and T. Yanagi, “Numerical modeling of tidal dynamics in the Java Sea,” J. Coast. Mar. Scie., 36(1), pp. 1-12., 2013.
  10. A. Kurniawan, S. K. Ooi, S. Hummel, and H. Gerritsen, 2011. “Sensitivity analysis of the tidal representation in Singapore regional waters in a data assimilation environment,” Ocean Dynamics, 61(8), pp.1121-1136, 2011.
  11. H. Sibtey, “Changes in Flow Hydro-Dynamics during Moderate, Typical and Extreme Historical Discharge Events at the Gautami Godavari River Entrance, India-A Case Study,” Jr. of Wat. Res. and Hydr. Eng., 5(4), pp. 160-171, 2016.
  12. M. Su, M. J. F. Stive, C. K. Zhang, P. Yao, Y. P. Chen, and Z. B. Wang, “The Tidal Wave System in the Chinese Marginal Seas,” Coastal Dyn., vol. 160, pp.1559-1570, 2013.
  13. Kantha, L. H. and C. A. Clayson., Numerical Models of Oceans and Oceanic Processes. International Geophysics Series. Academic Press, San Diego, vol. 66, p. 940, 2000.
  14. C. K. Shum., P. L. Woodworth, O. B. Anderson, G. D. Egbert, O. Francis, C. King, S. M. Klosko, C. Le. Provost, X. Li, J-M Molines, M. E. Parke, R. D. Ray, M. G. Sehlax, D. Stammer, C. C. Tiemey, P. Vincent, and C. I. Wunsch, “Accuracy assessment of recent ocean tide models,” Jour. of Geo. Res., C11(102), pp. 25, 173-25, 194, 1997.
  15. C. Le Provost, A. F. Bennett., and D. E. Cartwright., “Ocean tides for and from TOPEX/POSEIDON,” Science, vol. 267, pp. 639-642, 1995.